Continuing education: who meets the cost?
Steve Wright Consultant Nurse, Nursing Development Unit, Tameside General Hospital
Although there is general agreement that the UKCC’s proposals for continuing education are necessary and desirable, there is uncertainty about who should foot the bill for educational activities. Steve Wright explores the professional and legal implications and urges nurses and employers, both of whom may have to snake difficult financial sacrifices, to consider the investment potential of continuing education for nurses
Since the UKCC issued its first proposals for mandatory continuing education for nurses (1), there has been general agreement that this is a proper direction for nursing. The notion that a qualification after three years of study should be a passport to a lifetime of employment, with no requirement that the practitioner should show evidence of keeping up to date, would have few supporters.
Nursing Standard.
6, 16, 34-35.
doi: 10.7748/ns.6.16.34.s41
Want to read more?
Already have access? Log in
or
3-month trial offer for £5.25/month
Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
- Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
- RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
- NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
- Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
- A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days.
Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more