A comparison of two depot injection techniques
Intended for healthcare professionals
Art & Science Previous     Next

A comparison of two depot injection techniques

L’am Mac Gabhann Practice research nurse, Bracton Centre, Specialist Mental Health Service, Oxleas NHS Trust, Practice Research, Bromley Mental Health Services, Oxleas NHS Trust, Bexley, Kent

In the study reported in this article, the researchers attempted to raise awareness among practitioners of the importance of intramuscular drug administration technique in reducing injection site complications following antipsychotic depot injections. They also aimed to improve and expand the scope of present practice by comparing the effect of two accepted techniques, the ‘air bubble’ and ‘Z-track’ on these complications, and demonstrate that the air bubble technique is more effective in reducing seepage and causes less discomfort. A ‘within subjects’ design was used, and Likert scales for scoring subjective and objective assessment of complications were established and scored at each injection. The study showed that there was no significant difference between the effects of either technique

Nursing Standard. 12, 37, 39-41. doi: 10.7748/ns1998.06.12.37.39.c2512

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more