Evaluation of Dementia Training for Staff in Acute Hospital Settings
Intended for healthcare professionals
Art & Science Previous     Next

Evaluation of Dementia Training for Staff in Acute Hospital Settings

Analisa Smythe Research nurse, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT)
Catharine Jenkins Senior lecturer, Birmingham City University
Margaret Harries Older people’s lead, University Hospital Birmingham
Sue Atkins Dementia educator, University Hospital Birmingham
Juliet Miller Dementia educator, University Hospital Birmingham
Jan Wright Research nurse, BSMHFT
Nicola Wheeler Research assistant, BSMHFT
Philip Dee Senior lecturer, Birmingham City University
Peter Bentham Consultant psychiatrist, BSMHFT
Jan Oyebode Professor, Bradford University

Analisa Smythe and colleagues investigated the effectiveness of a brief psychosocial intervention delivered in the workplace compared with a standard teaching approach

The development, pilot and evaluation of a brief psychosocial training intervention (BPTI) for staff working with people with dementia in an acute hospital setting are described.

The project had two phases. Phase one involved adapting an existing competency framework and developing the BPTI using focus groups. For the pilot and evaluation, in phase two, a mixed methods approach was adopted using self-administered standardised questionnaires and qualitative interviews.

Qualitative analysis suggested that delivering skills-based training can develop communication, problem-solving and self-directed learning skills; benefit staff in terms of increased knowledge, skills and confidence; and be problematic in the clinical area in terms of time, organisation and the physical environment. These factors must be taken into consideration when delivering training. These changes were not reflected in the quantitative results and measures were not always sensitive to changes in this setting.

Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn about the efficacy of the intervention, due to the contradictory outcomes between the quantitative and qualitative data. Further developments and research are required to explore how staff and organisations can be supported to deliver the best possible care.

Nursing Older People. 26, 2, 18-24. doi: 10.7748/nop2014.02.26.2.18.e527

Correspondence

analisa.smythe@bsmhft.nhs.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 16 September 2013

Accepted: 15 October 2013

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more