Barriers to keeping warm in later life
Intended for healthcare professionals
Art & Science Previous     Next

Barriers to keeping warm in later life

Angela Tod Professor, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University
Adelaide Lusambili Researcher, NHS Rotherham at the time of writing. She is now research fellow, academic unit of elderly care and rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research
Jo Cooke Programme manager, Collaboration for Leadership, Applied Health Research and Care for South Yorkshire
Catherine Homer Researcher, Sheffield Hallam University
Jo Abbott Consultant in public health, Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Amanda Stocks Director AJ Stocks Ltd
Kath McDaid National Energy Action project development co-ordinator

Angela Tod and colleagues discuss why some older people may be at risk of cold-related harm and illness, and how nurses can improve their access to necessary aid and care

Aim To identify factors influencing older people’s ability to keep warm and well in winter.

Method This qualitative study used in-depth individual interviews with older people (n=50) and health and social care staff,(n=25), alongside six focus groups with 43 participants and a consultation event. Temperatures were measured in the homes of the older people interviewed. Framework analysis techniques were used.

Findings The data indicated a lack of awareness among participants of the importance to a person’s health of keeping warm. A summary of findings related to the themes of awareness, money, mindset and machinery is presented here, with reflections on their relevance to nursing in terms of identifying older people at risk of the negative health effects of cold, their assessment and support.

Conclusion The study revealed a number of ways older people are vulnerable to cold at home. Timely interventions from nurses in various sectors could help avoid cold-related harm.

Nursing Older People. 25, 10, 22-29. doi: 10.7748/nop2013.12.25.10.22.e434

Correspondence

a.tod@shu.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

This article presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme (grant reference number PB-PG-0408-16041) and supported by the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for South Yorkshire (CLAHRC SY). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health

Received: 03 January 2013

Accepted: 30 January 2013

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more