Reviews

The Patient Paradox: Why Sexed-up Medicine is Bad for Your Health

THIS BOOK offers a fascinating insight into the usefulness of modern medical screening. Practising GP Margaret McCartney bravely presents convincing and well-constructed arguments against a number of screening programmes in the UK, including those for breast cancer, cardiovascular risk, prostate, and cervical cancer. She investigates the evidence behind the propaganda that often surrounds these services. The book is well written, easy to read and use of diagrams and examples is clear.

The author argues that there is too much testing of people who are well through these different screening programmes. She describes how these services are set up to lead people to be tested, rather than to inform and let them choose whether or not they wish to be screened. She also writes about potentially negative consequences such as overdiagnosis, anxiety and increased costs.

Ms McCartney explores the position of the government and pharmaceutical companies, and the influence of charities on the healthcare system. She presents the inverse care law, whereby people who are the most ill end up having access to the least care or struggle to get the care they need. The author argues that the healthcare system has only helped to maintain this negative trend by focusing on offering screenings to the ‘worried well’.

The author ends by emphasising that doctors need to remain professional, make evidence-based decisions

...

The author argues that there is too much testing of people who are well through these different screening programmes. She describes how these services are set up to lead people to be tested, rather than to inform and let them choose whether or not they wish to be screened. She also writes about potentially negative consequences such as overdiagnosis, anxiety and increased costs.

Ms McCartney explores the position of the government and pharmaceutical companies, and the influence of charities on the healthcare system. She presents the inverse care law, whereby people who are the most ill end up having access to the least care or struggle to get the care they need. The author argues that the healthcare system has only helped to maintain this negative trend by focusing on offering screenings to the ‘worried well’.

The author ends by emphasising that doctors need to remain professional, make evidence-based decisions and provide better information to patients. However, she calls on patients to help drive the changes needed in the healthcare system, to hold doctors to account and push for fairer and beneficial health care for those who need it most.

Want to read more?

Subscribe for unlimited access

Enjoy 1 month's access for £1 and get:

  • Full access to nursing standard.com and the Nursing Standard app
  • Monthly digital edition
  • RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
  • RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
  • 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal

This article is not available as part of an institutional subscription. Why is this?