Social research design: framework for integrating philosophical and practical elements
Intended for healthcare professionals
Integration Previous     Next

Social research design: framework for integrating philosophical and practical elements

Kathryn Burns Cunningham PhD candidate/research assistant, University of Dundee, UK

Aim To provide and elucidate a comprehensible framework for the design of social research.

Background An abundance of information exists concerning the process of designing social research. The overall message that can be gleaned is that numerable elements – both philosophical (ontological and epistemological assumptions and theoretical perspective) and practical (issue to be addressed, purpose, aims and research questions) – are influential in the process of selecting a research methodology and methods, and that these elements and their inter-relationships must be considered and explicated to ensure a coherent research design that enables well-founded and meaningful conclusions. There is a lack of guidance concerning the integration of practical and philosophical elements, hindering their consideration and explication.

Data sources The author’s PhD research into loneliness and cancer.

Review methods This is a methodology paper.

Discussion A guiding framework that incorporates all of the philosophical and practical elements influential in social research design is presented. The chronological and informative relationships between the elements are discussed.

Conclusion The framework presented can be used by social researchers to consider and explicate the practical and philosophical elements influential in the selection of a methodology and methods.

Implications for practice/research It is hoped that the framework presented will aid social researchers with the design and the explication of the design of their research, thereby enhancing the credibility of their projects and enabling their research to establish well-founded and meaningful conclusions.

Nurse Researcher. 22, 1, 32-37. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.1.32.e1276

Correspondence

k.b.cunningham@dundee.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 18 August 2013

Accepted: 11 November 2013

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more