Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention?
Intended for healthcare professionals
General Previous     Next

Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention?

Caroline Bradbury-Jones Post-doctoral research fellow, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
Fiona Irvine Professor of nursing, Faculty of Health and Applied Social Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
Sally Sambrook Professor of HRD and deputy head of school, Bangor Business School, Bangor University, UK

Caroline Bradbury-Jones, Fiona Irvine and Sally Sambrook consider the use of member checks to improve the rigour of phenomenological research

Steps to enhance the rigour of qualitative research are much debated in nursing research. Prolonged engagement in the field, maintaining a journal and member checks (participant feedback) can help with this. This paper examines the latter, principally as we have been intrigued by the opposing viewpoints of nurse scholars regarding this matter. A process of critically analysing our research practice, coupled with an exploration of available literature has led to some clarity on the issue, as shared here.

Nurse Researcher. 17, 2, 25-33. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.01.17.2.25.c7459

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more